The Sociometer Theory and Our Psychological Need for Significance

  October 10, 2024

Nadia was a talented project manager at a mid-sized manufacturing company. Despite her skills and consistent performance, she started feeling increasingly invisible at work. Her contributions seemed to go unnoticed, her ideas were brushed aside, and her efforts went unacknowledged. Over time, Nadia became less engaged, her enthusiasm waned, and her effectiveness declined. It wasn't long before her team began to feel the impact of her detachment.

Why did this happen to Nadia? At the core of the issue was a fundamental human need: the need for significance. Nadia was experiencing a threat to this psychological need, which gradually eroded her motivation and performance.

The Struggle for Significance

Nadia's story is far from unique. Many people face situations where their psychological need for significance is threatened. According to sociometer theory, self-esteem functions as an internal gauge that provides feedback about our social value or acceptance (Leary, 2005). When our sociometer reads low, it signals that our significance—our sense of being valued by others—is at risk. This can lead to emotional discomfort and behaviors aimed at restoring our social standing.

Significance, as a psychological need, includes both status and self-esteem characteristics. Status refers to the respect and recognition we receive from others, while self-esteem reflects our internal evaluation of ourselves. Nadia's experience at work illustrates how powerful this need is: as she felt less significant, her sense of self-worth diminished, and her ability to contribute meaningfully suffered.

The Science Behind Threats to Significance

The need for significance is deeply rooted in our evolutionary history. Humans are social creatures, and our survival once depended on our ability to remain part of a group. Being excluded or undervalued could mean the difference between life and death. Although the stakes aren't usually that high today, our brains are still wired to perceive threats to our significance as deeply distressing (MacDonald & Leary, 2005).

Neuroscience research provides insight into how our brains respond to social threats. Studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have shown that social rejection activates the same neural pathways as physical pain (Eisenberger, Lieberman, & Williams, 2003). This overlap suggests that being ignored or undervalued is not just an inconvenience—it can be genuinely painful, which explains the emotional toll it took on Nadia.

When Nadia's ideas were dismissed, her brain registered this as a social threat, triggering the release of stress hormones like cortisol. Elevated cortisol levels can impair cognitive function, making it difficult to think clearly and make decisions (McEwen, 2007). This neurochemical response is part of why Nadia found herself becoming less effective at work—her sense of significance was threatened, and her brain responded by putting her in a stress state.

The need for status is also linked to our brain's reward system. When we gain recognition or are valued by others, our brain releases dopamine, a "feel-good" neurotransmitter (Izuma et al., 2008). For Nadia, the lack of acknowledgment deprived her brain of these rewarding experiences, contributing to her disillusionment and disengagement.

Empowering Ways to Meet the Need for Significance

The good news is that there are ways to meet our psychological need for significance in healthy and empowering ways. The journey Nadia went through to turn her situation around demonstrates how this can be achieved. Let’s explore three key strategies she employed.

1. Seeking Constructive Feedback

Nadia recognized that she needed a certain level of validation, but instead of waiting passively for acknowledgment from her supervisors, she took an active approach. She began seeking constructive feedback from both her peers and superiors. This provided her with insights on how she could improve and also reminded her of her strengths and the value she brought to the team.

Research shows that receiving feedback, that we perceive as positive, is an effective way to enhance self-esteem and improve perceived status (Leary et al., 1995). However, negative feedback can have detrimental effects if not delivered constructively, potentially leading to feelings of inadequacy and defensiveness. This highlights the importance of adopting a growth mindset when receiving feedback, as it allows us to view it as an opportunity for improvement rather than a threat to our self-worth. By actively seeking feedback as an opportunity to improve, Nadia was able to shift her sociometer back into a healthier range, feeling more connected and valued by her peers.

2. Fostering Social Connections

Another key aspect of Nadia's transformation was building stronger social connections at work. She made an effort to engage more with her colleagues—both inside and outside of work. She organized small gatherings, joined informal meetings, and offered support when her coworkers faced challenges.

According to Baumeister and Leary's "belongingness hypothesis," humans have an intrinsic need to form and maintain strong, stable interpersonal relationships (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). These connections are crucial for maintaining a sense of significance. For Nadia, fostering these social bonds helped her feel more integrated within the team, enhancing her self-esteem and perceived social value.

From a neuroscience perspective, social interactions can boost levels of oxytocin, often called the "bonding hormone" (Heinrichs, von Dawans, & Domes, 2009). Higher oxytocin levels promote feelings of trust and connection, which help alleviate feelings of social threat and insignificance. As Nadia strengthened her workplace relationships, her brain's reward system began to react positively, further boosting her motivation and engagement.

3. Reframing Success and Focusing on Contribution

Nadia also changed how she defined success. Instead of focusing solely on external recognition, she began to evaluate her work based on her contributions to the team and the positive impact she had on others. This subtle shift allowed her to reclaim her sense of significance from within rather than relying entirely on external validation.

Psychology research suggests that those who derive their self-esteem from intrinsic values, such as personal growth or contributing to the well-being of others, tend to have more stable and enduring self-esteem (Crocker & Park, 2004). For Nadia, focusing on what she could control—her own efforts and the support she provided to her colleagues—enabled her to regain a sense of significance in an empowering way.

Reclaiming Significance in Empowering Ways

Nadia's journey from feeling invisible to feeling empowered highlights the critical importance of fulfilling our psychological need for significance. Sociometer theory shows how threats to self-esteem can undermine our behavior and effectiveness, while neuroscience reveals the deep impact that social threats have on our mental and emotional well-being.

By actively seeking feedback, fostering social connections, and reframing her definition of success, Nadia managed to restore her sense of significance at work. Her story shows that, while threats to our need for significance are common, there are effective strategies we can use to meet this need in ways that are empowering and sustainable.

Ultimately, the need for significance is not something to be dismissed as mere ego. It is a core component of our psychological well-being, deeply embedded in our evolution and physiology. By understanding and addressing this need, we can enhance not only our own well-being but also our capacity to contribute meaningfully in all aspects of our lives.

Take the PsychASSETS Assessment and download your professional report to discover psychological needs essential for thriving at work.

References
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392-414.
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292.
Heinrichs, M., von Dawans, B., & Domes, G. (2009). Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30(4), 548-557.
Izuma, K., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2008). Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron, 58(2), 284-294.
Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 75-111.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518-530.
MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202-223.
McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87(3), 873-904.